Millions of cell phone users across the globe ought to be aware of the potential risks that they face daily from electromagnetic fields (EMFs), which are, of course, electromagnetic radiation. The EMFs are unavoidable and certainly there has been an established relationship between, cancer, leukemia, hormonal dysfunction and a full battery of negative effects on the central nervous system, the immune system and right down to the cellular membrane. The EMFs predominantly affect neurological tissue and the largest collection of this tissue is the brain.
This is where the cell phones and wireless technology wreaks havoc on the human beings because these are held at the thinnest part of the skull next to the brain.
Making these observations at a health awareness workshop here last evening, renowned health scientist and researcher aid it was very well documented that cell phones, which emitted electromagnetic fields, could cause genetic damage, aberrant brain wave activity and even changes to the permeability of the blood brain barrier.
Since those initial findings, the association and dose-relationships between cell phones and disease, place cell phone users into a high-risk health group. The effects of EMFs are on a cumulative basis, so awareness of the environment can help people make wise decisions. In this context, many cell phone users have claimed to have a solution to the problem by creating EMF blockers that attach to cell phones, but there are two fundamental issues which have to be looked into and properly dealt with before these products can be recommended for use.”
Magnetic noise field technology involved the superimposition of a random noise field wave onto potentially damaging electromagnetic radiation waves making them invisible to the receptors on the cellular membrane that normally responded and were subsequently affected.
The Risks Associated With EMF”, his ninth book on health safety, further observed that special polymer had been laboratory tested involving standard acceptable physiological criteria such as EEG (electroencephalogram), MRA (magnetic resonance angiography), SAR (specific absorption rate), thermography, and live blood cell dark field microscopic analysis to name a few. All of these physiological parameters demonstrated extremely positive results to the point that, in almost all cases, the resultant findings were equal to or superior to the controls.
- By Paul Perry
